http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/opinion/chappatte-cartoon-france-in-mali.html?_r=0 |
Due to my
interest in counter-terrorism, I have found the situation in Mali quite
fascinating (and horrible at the same) since the takeover of northern Mali by
the Islamist extremists. In this blog, I would like to give a brief background
to the situation in Mali, discuss the current situation and give some future
projections and suggestions as to how the international community should
proceed. I should also mention that I have helped Senator Mobina Jaffer in
creating her own blog on this issue, with strong focus on how the situation
affected the women in Mali. You can read her blog here: http://www.mobinajaffer.ca/women/resolution-1325-and-the-need-to-empower-malian-women . However, as I have mentioned,
I will discuss the situation in Mali in more broad terms. So here we go!
Then
For more
than a decade, Mali has been a model democratic nation for the other African
countries. However, in spring of 2012, the situation in Mali took a turn
for the worst after the ousting of President Toure by the Tuareg nationalists
(also known as MNLA or National Movement of the Liberation of Azawad) with the help of Islamist extremists.
Although MNLA has gained independence of Azawad, they decided to renounce its
claim on Azawad due to conflicting aims with the Islamist extremists. Thus
northern Mali was left in the hands of the extremists.
However,
one needs to keep in mind that the Islamist extremists were never one unified
group. Indeed, they are composed of three groups: Ansar Dine, Jihad in West
Africa (MUJAO) and al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQUIM). Although they only had loose ties to
each other, they all wanted to impose a hard-line form of Sharia - the
Saudi-inspired Wahhabi/Salafi sect of Islam. However, the brutality imposed by
these extremists should not be blindly accepted as the teachings of Sharia.
Indeed, Saran Keita Diakite,
president of the Women's Peace and Security network for the West African
economic community ECOWAS, explained that: “They cut off people arms and beat
up women who have had sex outside marriage ... while they themselves are raping
girls and women and are forcing girls to marry. The first night, [the bride] is
forced to have sex with five to six men. It's not Sharia."
The international community stood by and watched the
horror unfolding in northern Mali… That is not to say that wheels were not
turning. For example, in December 2012, UN Security Council passed resolution 2085 that
recalled previous resolutions regarding the Northern Mali conflict,
resolutions 2056 and 2071, in
authorizing action. In addition, according to Ban Ki Moon, it “aimed at the
full restoration of Mali’s constitutional order and territorial integrity”. However,
as with everything in bureaucracy, and especially international bureaucracy,
everything takes time. People in northern Mali did not have any time to spare.
However,
the rebel capture of Konna, and the looming takeover of a
vital militarily airfield in the town of Sevare (that also had a lot of French
citizens),
prompted a proactive military intervention by France. French government
was also worried that Mali would become the breeding ground for French-Mali
jihadists, who would then spread their message to Malian immigrants in France
thus they decided to intervene. Although UNSCR 2085
calls for financial support from Member States, France’s allies were content
with just providing some planes and a lot of promises to think about greater
contributions. Unfortunately for France, the Islamists extremists vowed to make
France pay for their proactive military intervention in Mali. It was said that
Algerian gas facility hostage situation was in response to the French first air
strikes in Mali. The initial intervention that started on January 11th
looked promising, but the military successes stalled as the extremists turned to
guerilla warfare.
Now
France has contributed around 4,000 soldiers to the
fight in northern Mali. With the help of 2900 West African soldiers from
Chad, Nigeria, Togo, Burkina Faso and Senegal, they have driven out the
Islamist extremists out of northern Mali. However, the extremists have
retreated into the desert from where they are carrying out guerilla warfare
with the French and African forces. Thus far, the invention cost France around
133$m.
Although French government has been “withdrawing”
its forces since March, it is doing so very slowly and most of them are likely
to stay at least until July. France has never intended to stay long-term in
Mali. It achieved its goals of stopping the advancement of the extremists and
freeing northern cities from their rule. It is now focusing on rooting out
rebel holdouts and training African troops to take over peacekeeping efforts
once the French leave.
On 25 April 2013, the Security Council adopted resolution
2100 authorizes deployment
of a UN force comprising 11,200 military personnel and 1,440 international
police, which would take over from and absorb UN African-led mission AFISMA
on July 1. However, the newly created UN force MINUSMA will not be authorized
to undertake offensive military operations against the extremists, thus it is
likely that this function will be carried out by remaining French forces that
supposed to dwindle to 1000 troops by the end of the year.
The Future?
The waiting game. The extremists have retreated into
the shadows for now, but they are waiting for their chance to reclaim what they
have lost. The French politicians are under a lot of pressure to make sure that
they do loose the support of the people, which is why they have begun
withdrawing their forces. The Member States’ support for MINUSMA will wane with
time as well.
If there
aren’t extremists posing a major threat in areas where the UN troops will
operate or if international military forces are not conducting major combat
operations in those areas, then
MINUSMA will take over on July 1. However, what will happen if that is not the
case? French and West African forces
will be responsible for carrying out the fighting, until UN deems it safe to go
in and set up camp. It is most likely that the extremists do not have the
capability or the organization between themselves to organize another major takeover
of the area. This means paints a very familiar picture: guerilla warfare against
peacekeepers that are not authorized to do much other than defend themselves.
Making MINUSMA peace enforcers would allow them to use
lethal force in serious combat situations, but this is unlikely to fly with
some of the permanent Security Council members, such as Russia. On the other
hand, MINUSMA is going to be supported by some remaining French troops that
will carry out strategic military operations, but will that be enough?? What
happens after the French leave and there are still guerilla extremists out
there?
So back to the waiting game, the extremists have all
the time in the world to wait compared to UN or France. Political realities for
them are quite time constraining. Thus what we need to do is not focus on “stabilizing”
the region with peacekeepers, because it will never be stable if the Malians
know that the extremists are hiding in the shadows are just waiting for the
right moment to strike back. We have to make sure that fear is neutralized, by …
well, “neutralizing” the extremists.
The only way to fight guerilla warfare is by using
guerilla warfare (i.e. counterguerilla AND counterinsurgency (COIN) operations –
see definitions below). Therefore, there should be dedicated and weighty counterguerilla
and COIN units to which enough resources are dedicated to be able to deal with
the guerrilla tactics of the extremists. This means that either the French
forces should entirely dedicate themselves to this goal or there should be a counterguerilla
/COIN unit within MINUSMA. In order to truly to deal with the extremists,
counterguerilla/COIN should be the primary goal before any peacekeeping or
peacebuilding efforts. Moreover, counter-insurgency effort will not be a
short-term affair thus units that can stay in Mali for some time need to be
dedicated to the mission. Moreover, West African forces should be trained on
counter-insurgency, rather than stabilization or peacekeeping. If they do this,
then there will be a smooth transition from counterguerrila efforts carried out
by French forces (which they should be doing) to COIN carried out by West African
forces.
It is important to wipe out the extremists as
quickly and as efficiently as possible, because time is on their side. If we
use conventional military tactics to fight unconventional (guerilla) tactics,
it will take a very long time with very few victories for our side. We’ll
eventually give up and go home.
In the meantime, radicalization could be in full
swing. The instability, fear and broken homes from which the youth will search
for something to identify with - such as a sense of purpose and a sense of belonging
to a group, which can easily be perverted and manipulated to identify with
extremists groups and jihad – will create an environment that will breed ample
opportunities for the extremists to radicalize the youth (or not youth). Thus
we need act now, and we need to so strategically and swiftly.
Counterguerilla operations - focus
on detecting and defeating the armed insurgent or guerrilla, without solving
the society’s underlying problems. Military efforts alone, however, cannot
defeat an insurgency.
Counterinsurgency (COIN) - involves
all political, economic, military, paramilitary, psychological, and civic
actions that can be taken by a government to defeat an insurgency. COIN
operations include supporting a Host Nation’s military,
paramilitary, political, economic, psychological, and civic actions taken to
defeat an insurgency. Avoiding the creation of new insurgents and forcing existing
insurgents to end their participation is vital to defeating an insurgency. COIN
operations often include security assistance programs such as foreign military
sales programs, the foreign military financing program, and international military
training and education programs.